Buy Coins

Coin News

PMG Currency

Coin Talk

Numismatic News

MS70 Coins

MS66 Morgan Dollars

Friday, January 30, 2009

2009 Lincoln Commemorative Silver Dollar



by U.S. Mint


The United States Mint will release the 2009 Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Silver Dollar on February 12, 2009. This date will also mark the 200th aniversary of Lincoln's birth and the release date for the first 2009 Lincoln Cent design. While the commemorative coin's designs and release date had been known previously, there is some new information regarding price and ordering options.

The 2009 Lincoln Commemorative will be offered in both proof and uncirculated versions with a combined maximum authorized mintage of 500,000 coins. According to a recent article from Coin World, the proof coins will be priced at $37.95 and the uncirculated coins will be priced at $31.95. These prices will apply for coins ordered during the pre-issue discount period (February 12 - March 26, 2009). There will be an initial household limit of 100, each for proof and uncirculated coins.

This pricing actually represents a decrease from last year's pricing level for silver dollar commemoratives. The 2008 Bald Eagle Commemorative Silver Dollars were priced at $39.95 and $35.95 during the pre-issue discount period.

The US Mint will reserve 50,000 coins from the 500,000 maximum authorized mintage for inclusion within a special set. This set will feature proof versions of all four 2009 Lincoln Cents and the proof version of the 2009 Lincoln Commemorative. This set has not been listed on the US Mint's product release schedule, but should be available in the spring.

In my opinion, the 2009 Lincoln Commemorative will be popular and has the potential for a sell out. Lincoln is a well known historical figure, which usually bolsters commemorative coin sales. The release of the four newly designed 2009 Lincoln Cents should also serve to build collector and even mainstream awareness of the commemorative coin. Lastly, if the unavailability of the 2009-W Uncirculated Silver Eagles and 2009 Proof Silver Ealges continues, collectors may opt to purchase silver coins from the US Mint's commemoartive programs.

The last comemorative silver dollar to sell out was the 2006 Benjamin Franklin Commemorative. Prior to that was the 2001 American Buffalo Commemorative Silver Dollar. Last year's 2007 Bald Eagle Commemorative Silver Dollar came close with total combined sales across all product options of 415,122 out of a maximum 500,000.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

2009 U.S. Mint Presidential $1 Coin Proof Set Available 2/10



by U.S. Mint


Proof versions of the circulating Presidential $1 Coins scheduled to be released this year will be available in one set beginning 12 noon Eastern Time on February 10, 2009.  The 2009 United States Mint Presidential $1 Coin Proof Set TM, priced at $14.95, contains coins honoring William Henry Harrison, John Tyler, James K. Polk and Zachary Taylor.  Each coin has a common reverse design featuring a striking rendition of the Statue of Liberty.

The term "proof" refers to a manufacturing process in which specially treated coin blanks are struck multiple times with specially polished dies to create a brilliant, sharp relief and mirror-like background.  A frosted, sculpted foreground gives the proof coin a special "cameo" effect.  The "S" mint mark, representing production at the United States Mint at San Francisco, is inscribed on the edge of each coin.

Customers may order the 2009 United States Mint Presidential $1 Coin Proof Set at www.usmint.gov or at 1-800-USA-MINT (872-6468).  Hearing- and speech-impaired customers with TTY equipment may call 1-888-321-MINT (6468) to place an order.  A shipping and handling fee of $4.95 per order will be added to all domestic orders.  There is no order limit or mintage limit on this set.

Customers also may enroll in the United States Mint Online Subscription Program to receive automatic shipments of the United States Mint Presidential $1 Coin Proof Set and other select products when they become available.  Visit www.usmint.gov for more information on this convenient, carefree shopping method.

Presidential $1 Coins for general circulation will be released throughout 2009, beginning with the William Henry Harrison Presidential $1 Coin on February 19.

Friday, January 23, 2009

NASA Gold and Silver Coin Legislation Again




By CoinNews.net



Collectors who enjoy planetary themed proof coins may get another chance at adding ten more to their collection beginning in 2011.

A new NASA commemorative bill has been introduced again that seeks to "mint and issue $50 gold and $1 silver coins emblematic of the 50 years of exemplary and unparalleled achievements of NASA."

H.R. 255, entitled the NASA 50th Anniversary Commemorative Coin Act, was introduced by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee on January 7, 2009.

The act may sound familiar as it has become a yearly tradition of late. In 2007, a nearly identical H.R. 2750 passed in the House. In 2008, the Senate passed S. 2159, which had but a few changes. The 110th congress was unable to synchronize either before its session ended, resulting in this latest attempt for the 111th congress to consider.

Ironically, NASA began operation on October 1, 1958 and celebrated its 50th anniversary last October. The legislators may minimally want to consider a new bill name.

As for the details, H.R. 255 calls for up to 50,000 gold coins with a reverse design honoring U.S. astronauts who lost their lives in the line of duty. The obverse or heads side would depict the sun.

A maximum of 300,000 $1 silver coins for each of 9 designs would be authorized as well. The obverse of these would bear an image consistent with the nine planets (in the case of Pluto, a dwarf planet). The legislation provides specific guidelines for the reverse of four designs:

EARTH COIN- The reverse of the $1 coins issued under this Act which bear an image of the Earth on the obverse shall bear images emblematic of, and honoring, the discoveries and missions of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Mercury, Gemini, and Space Shuttle missions and other manned Earth-orbiting missions, and the Apollo missions to the Moon.

(II) JUPITER COIN- The reverse of the $1 coins issued under this Act which bear an image of the planet Jupiter on the obverse shall include a scientifically accurate depiction of the Galilean moon Europa and depict both a past and future mission to Europa.

(III) SATURN COIN- The reverse of the $1 coins issued under this Act which bear an image of the planet Saturn on the obverse shall include a scientifically accurate depiction of the moon Titan and depict both a past and a future mission to Titan.

(IV) PLUTO (AND OTHER DWARF PLANETS) COIN- The reverse of the $1 coins issued under this Act which bear an image of the planet Pluto on the obverse shall include a design that is emblematic of telescopic exploration of deep space by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the ongoing search for Earth-like planets orbiting other stars.

H.R. 255 additionally would authorize a bronze duplicate of the $50 proof gold coin.

Each coin would have a surcharge of:

(1) $50 per $50 coin;
(2) $10 per $1 coin; and
(3) $1 per coin for any bronze duplicate.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

ACCG Gains Influence With Collectors




By Richard Giedroyc



The Ancient Coin Collectors Guild is defending more than collectors of ancient coins against special interests in archaeogical circles who would outlaw collecting ancient coins if these people could legislate it. Readers should understand that the ACCG is defending all collectors regardless of the age of the coins in their collections, since these special interests claim just about any object of any significant age is the cultural patrimony of the country where it was either found or originated and for this reason should be repatriated to that country regardless of who has current title to that object. Defining what exactly these "objects" are is vague, but the archaeologists and legislators involved have ensured the definition is still clear enough to include coins.

Consider this a shameless plug for the ACCG if you like, but this is an organization worth plugging. The latest news of the organization is likely best explained by its director, Wayne G. Sayles.

Sayles is quoted in the December 2008 issue of The Celator, a magazine for collectors of ancient coins, as saying, "The ACCG has come a very long way in the four years of its existence, and is a force to be reckoned with on the cultural property scene."

Sayles is responding to an unintended compliment the ACCG received from archaeologist Paul Barford in a recent blog. In that blog Barford calls the ACCG "the most prominent ancient coin collectors' lobby group worldwide."

Sayles continues in The Celator, saying: "While antiquities dealers and organizations, with the exception of Hershel Shanks, have all but vanished from the cultural property debate, the ACCG has grown stronger, more capable, and more aggressive in defending the rights of private collectors of ancient coins. Even the museum community is unable to mount the sort of resistance that it once did."

Sayles makes a plug worth reiterating here, saying: "If you, as a collector or dealer, are not a member of the ACCG you simply must not understand what the ACCG does for you. The guild will be launching a membership campaign at the turn of the year, and I would hope - strike that - I would expect that every reader of The Celator would want to be a member of the ACCG. It is the only collector organization that aggressively opposes the formidable pressures against private collecting."

Sayles may have directed his comments towards readers of The Celator, but readers of World Coin News should understand that the term "ancient" is now being liberally applied to much more modern coins by nations that would like to prevent collectors and museums from owning what those nations have decided are their cultural patrimony. The Peoples' Republic of China, as an example, has been defining ancient coins of China as those being struck prior to 1911, while attempting to demand the return of their ancient coins from private collectors and museums by lobbying the U.S. government for legislation that would mandate it.

The ACCG can be contacted at www.accg.org.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Quarters Detailed




By Mike Thorne



How do you feel about the Standing Liberty quarter, minted from 1916-1930? If you're like most collectors, you probably think it's one of the most interesting and attractive 20th-century issues. That's certainly the way I feel about the series.

After all, Standing Liberty quarters were still circulating when I started collecting in the mid-1950s. Remember, that was only about 25 years after the Mint stopped making the coins. The next time you're at the bank, get a couple of quarter rolls and see how many 25+ year-old coins you can find.

As I said, Standing Liberty quarters turned up from time to time, and these weren't dateless coins either. The best find I can remember was a 1927-D my father retrieved from the coffee change at his office. A certification company assigned it a grade of About Uncirculated-58.

All of this is by way of introduction to J. H. Cline's fourth edition of Standing Liberty Quarters. Cline has the reputation of being an expert and aficionado of this series. His previous edition of this book was published in 1997, a decade before the 2007 publication date of this new edition.

Just a glance at the new edition informs me that Cline has added 60 pages. Published by Zyrus Press, the fourth edition appears to be more professionally done than the third edition, which was self-published. 

Still, Cline's latest work has the same personal touch as his earlier editions. It's obvious from his writing that this is a coin he dearly loves. As he puts it in "How I Got Started and Other Stories," "Like no other coin or series, I loved the Standing Liberty quarter at first sight and that love still burns white hot!" Cline was motivated to write about this love when he "began to look for anything in print about the series, and found nothing."

Cline doesn't begin this book with a look at the development of the coin, as you might expect. Instead, he talks about his visit in 1995 to the Smithsonian Institution, where he was able to examine the Standing Liberty quarters in the National Numismatic Collection. "It was a dream come true!" he exclaims. He ends this brief chapter with a description of some memorable pieces he studied at the museum. One that caught my eye was a 1927-D, which he writes "looks deep mirror prooflike and has a frosty eagle, but it is not a Full Head."

Chapter 3 tells about the artist, Hermon Atkins MacNeil, and the next chapter deals with the headaches involved in actually bringing the Standing Liberty quarter to fruition. The title of this chapter, appropriately, is "Government Bureaucracy." Cline's written material is supplemented with several pages of copies of the correspondence between MacNeil and various mint officials.

In Chapter 5, Cline briefly explores the possibility of two models for the final coin. Doris Doscher, the woman usually credited with modeling for MacNeil, was, according to Cline, "one of the first women to promote natural medicine and exercise for good health." She became a devotee of self-improvement following her successful recovery from polio.

The other possibility was Irene MacDowell, the wife of MacNeil's tennis partner. The Evening News of Newburgh, N.Y., published shortly before MacDowell's death, "carried almost a full page article of Irene MacDowell in which she finally admits to being the 'barebreasted' beauty that posed for her friend, Hermon MacNeil."

Cline is particularly fascinated with full head Standing Liberty quarters, which are analogous to full bell lines Franklin halves, full split bands Mercury dimes, etc. In other words, a fully struck Standing Liberty quarter can be identified by the detail on Liberty's head. In Chapter 7, "The Connoisseur Section," Cline includes a date-by-date examination of the series. As an illustration of what he has to say about individual dates, he writes of the 1927-S: "Very, very tough! Have handled less than 10 pieces in sharp Full Head MS65.& Probably a 10 piece or less availability. TOUGH!!!"

Chapter 8 is the heart of the book, as this is where Cline presents his "Year and Mintmark Analysis" of the series. The description of each coin takes approximately a page and a half. As you would expect, there's a picture of the coin's obverse and reverse along with the date's mintage. This is followed by the coin's rank in terms of price, then its quantity rank. To illustrate, for the 1927-S the mintage was 396,000, which gives it a quantity ranking of 3 (after the 1918/7-S and the 1916). The price rank is 2, as the coin is second only to the overdate in price in Mint State-65 with full head.

Next, Cline has a chart of "Estimated Population by Grade." According to this chart, he estimates that approximately 67 percent of the remaining coins grade from Good-Very Fine, and that only 3 percent of the date are in gem condition. "Less than 1% struck with Full Heads," he writes.

In one interesting paragraph, Cline compares the 1927-S with the 1916 in terms of the number of full heads. "Your author would rate it three to five times rarer than the 1916 in Full Head. With that said, the present price for a 1927-S FH is not in line with the real scarcity of the coin. In the 45 years your author has collected and admired these coins, the ratio I have observed is at least one 1927-S to twenty-five 1916s with Full Heads.

Near the end of the 1927-S section, Cline has a table based on Professional Coin Grading Service and Numismatic Guaranty Corp. population numbers giving the availability of full heads in mint-state grades from MS-64 to MS-67. For MS-65, the two major services have certified a total of seven full head pieces, with another 65 in this grade without full heads.

Note that I've merely scratched the surface of what you can find about Standing Liberty quarters in Cline's new edition. Fortunately, the list price of the book is quite low at $21.95. If you like and/or collect the series, if only by type, then Cline's book should be in your numismatic library. 

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

When U.S. needs money in Civil War, it turns to Lincoln and demand notes

By Jeff Starck



When the U.S. government got into the business of issuing paper money to support the nation during the Civil War, it relied on a well-known salesman to make the pitch.

Images courtesy of www.HeritageCurrency.com. Abraham Lincoln appears on the Series 1861 $10 demand notes, known also as "Greenbacks" for their colorful backs. The notes were part of an issue meant to fund the U.S. government's operation during the Civil War.
The $10 denomination of these Series 1861 non-interest-bearing notes, or demand notes, depict President Abraham Lincoln, a historical feat that was more than circumstantial.

Demand notes are notable for being the first federal paper money issued for circulation. The $5 and $20 demand notes depict allegorical figures but bear no portraits. Thus Lincoln's portrait made the $10 notes the first U.S. federal paper money to depict a living person.

Lincoln's appearance on these notes was a political act. Lincoln's portrait, engraved by Frederick Girsch based on a photograph by C.S. German, acted as "the visualization of a political myth into a commercial image," according to Fred Reed in Coin World (July 10, 2000, issue).

"On currency, we witness this materialization of metaphor: the federal government's money was valuable because it was identified with the president and the destiny of our federal Union."

It was a critical time for the Union as it approached bankruptcy while engaging in war.

Salmon P. Chase, secretary of the Treasury under Lincoln, proposed the production of non-interest-bearing notes to circulate as money to raise necessary funds.

According to Wesley Clair Mitchell in A History of the Greenbacks, in spite of doubts "that the government had the constitutional authority to issue paper money, Congress adopted Chase's plan in the Act of July 17, 1861, and the first U.S. government-issued paper money came into being."

The Acts of July 17 and Aug. 5, 1861, authorized the production of $60 million of the notes that became popularly known as "demand notes," a title based on certain provisions of their issuance.

Each note bears the promise to pay the bearer the designated number (five, 10 or 20) of dollars on demand. Payment, however, could be made by only the assistant treasurer of the United States at Boston, New York, Philadelphia, St. Louis or Cincinnati.

Demand notes were also nicknamed "Greenbacks" for the green ink used on the back.

According to Paper Money of the United States by Arthur L. and Ira S. Friedberg, the notes are additionally unique in U.S. currency in that "they alone bear neither the Treasury Seal nor the actual names of the Treasurer and Register of the Treasury. They also have the serial number imprinted only once."

Demand notes bear the dates July 17, 1861, and Aug. 10, 1861. The later date may represent the days the notes were first issued to the public.

An 1861 issue of notes totaling $50 million in face value was followed by an issue of $10 million in total face value in February 1862. The two issues were produced by both the American Bank Note Co. and the National Bank Note Co., each a private printer in New York under contract with the government.

The $10 note's face design features a bust of Abraham Lincoln to the left, a vignette of an eagle with draped shield in the top center and an allegorical female representing Art to the right.

On the back, the numeral 10 appears both to the right and left of a Roman numeral X, with ten dollars centered in the top and bottom of the bill.

According to Mitchell, demand notes were payable in gold on demand at the subtreasuries and receivable for taxes and custom dues.

The government suspended specie or in-kind payments after Dec. 28, 1861, and the new paper money could not be converted into coin, either silver or gold, explain the Friedbergs. Redemption was thus an empty promise, and the public was forced to accept the new currency purely on faith, believing that the money would be good.

That was a tough sell.

Merchants, store owners and railroad corporations refused them or restricted their use. Banks worried government money would drive their own issues from circulation, Mitchell states.

The notes gained some traction because the government used them to pay soldiers and creditors, and the secretary and other Treasury officials signed a paper agreeing to take them in payment of their salaries.

By 1862, demand notes had gained a foothold in the American consciousness, just as they were being withdrawn in favor of other paper money.

A small quantity of notes is extant, and Lincoln's image remains as a lesson in the politics of paper money during wartime.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Denver Lincolns in "S" Shadow
By Paul M. Green


New Lincoln cent designs in 2009 are likely to bring in new collectors of Lincoln cents. This will test existing supplies of 100 years of Lincoln cents. If there is one place you might very well want to look for good values today, that is in the usually overlooked Lincoln cents of Denver.

The Lincoln cents from Denver with the exception of the 1914-D and 1922 with no "D" receive very little attention. It should not be that way, but it has been a long-standing fact of life with Lincoln cents that the bulk of the attention goes to the generally lower mintage cents from San Francisco. That has meant that if you want some sleeping values in Lincoln cents, the cents of Denver are an awfully good place to look.

At the time Denver produced its first Lincoln cent in 1911 the facility was still less than a decade old. The delay in producing Lincoln cents, which had made their debut in 1909, is hard to explain beyond the simple fact that the priorities for the new facility were apparently not cents. In reality, it is not all that unusual as it would take until 1912 before Denver and San Francisco would produce their first nickels, so realistically it simply appears that it took time for the branch mints to begin producing the lower denominations once they had been authorized to do so. 

The first Denver cent was the 1911-D Lincoln and it was emerging into a world where collectors were just getting used to the idea of cents being produced outside Philadelphia. For years there could be no production of coins containing no gold or silver at facilities other than Philadelphia and that restriction had only been recently lifted. As a result, even San Francisco, which had been making coins since 1854 did not produce its first cent until 1908. Denver, on the other hand, had been striking coins only since 1906. 

The 1911-D cent had a mintage of 12,672,000 and although the thought is as the first cent from Denver it might have been heavily saved, there is no real evidence of especially strong saving by anybody. Certainly a few extra examples were set aside, but realistically the 1911-D is not like the 1909 VDB where rolls were being discovered for years.

At $5.25 in G-4, the 1911-D is basically at about the price you might expect for a coin of its age and mintage. In MS-60 at $92 it is cheaper than the 1912-D and the same is true of the $1,550 MS-65 price. This might be due to a little extra supply from a higher mintage.

There is a little evidence of saving as the Professional Coin Grading Service reports 145 examples in MS-65 or better and that is a little high for a Denver issue of the period, but that said the 1911-S is $3,300 in MS-65 and the PCGS total for the 1911-S in MS-65 or better is 110, so it can hardly be suggested that the 1911-D is available in extremely high numbers. In fact, you have to conclude with roughly 35 more examples of the 1911-D graded by PCGS its nearly $2,000 lower price makes it a pretty good deal.

The 1912-D seems to get more attention than the historic 1911-D perhaps in part because what limited extra saving there was in 1911 would not carry over into 1912 and perhaps because the 1912-D had a slightly lower mintage at just 10,411,000, which translates into a $7 G-4 price today with an MS-60 at $165 and an MS-65 at $2,800, which is significantly higher than the 1911-D and with good reason as PCGS reports just 83 examples, roughly 60 fewer than the 1911-D. 

The trend continues with the 1913-D, which had a higher 15,804,000 mintage. That makes it less costly in G-4 at just $3 while an MS-60 is $98, but an MS-65 is $2,100 and that price is supported by the fact that PCGS reports just 102 examples, a total still well below the 1911-D.

If any early Denver date is not overlooked it would have to be the 1914-D. With a mintage of 1,193,000, the 1914-D from the start was a better date but realistically it was not given the attention it might have received as its low mintage did not look all that low when compared to the 1909-S VDB.

In any grade the 1914-D is better with a G-4 at $220, which is a solid increase from a price around $80 in the same grade back in 1998 and among regular dates that $220 price puts it behind only the 1909-S VDB among the regular Lincoln dates. Where the 1914-D become special, however is in Mint State where it lists for $1,975 in MS-60 and $24,000 in MS-65 and that listing is up from just $3,900 back in 1998. 

Things are a little tricky with the 1914-D as in MS-65 PCGS reports a total of 90 coins, which is actually higher than the 1912-D, and which seems high when compared to a number of other issues. Perhaps the 1914-D is more available even in top grades than we expect but a more likely reason is a continuing flow of coins to the grading services in the hope of getting higher grades as any 1914-D that can come back with a grade higher than MS-65 is likely to be a featured coin at auction and a candidate for headlines with one of those surprising prices ultra- grade coins sometimes command.

It must also be remembered that with a reputation as the key Lincoln cent in MS-65, the demand for the 1914-D remains higher than usual, so we have a variety of factors potentially playing a role in producing what seems like a very high price considering the numbers graded.

The 1915-D would have a higher mintage of 22,050,000, although today that hardly appears to be a large number, but at the time it was the first Denver cent to top the 20 million mark. That higher total makes the 1915-D just a $1.75 coin in G-4 while an MS-60 is just $70 with an MS-65 at $1,350. The PCGS total of just over 120 examples graded in MS-65 makes the 1915-D a more available early date although it is still seen less often than the 1911-D.

In the dates that follow we see evidence that at least some are monitoring the availability of Denver dates more carefully than we might suspect. The dates from 1916-1920 had higher mintages in most cases and basically went unnoticed by collectors for many years. The dates while not very expensive in MS-60 today with prices safely under $100 are a very different matter in MS-65.

If you look at the dates from Denver during the period you find that the 1916-D and 1917-D are $3,300 and $3,000, respectively, in MS-65 with the 1918-D at $3,650 and the 1919-D at $2,700 and the 1920-D at $2,750. Those levels seem high when compared to the earlier lower mintage dates. In fact, the prices are not high as the grading services support the prices as the 1918-D for example has been seen by PCGS just 51 times in MS-65 a total about one-half the number of the 1914-D. It is that way with the other dates as well, so while not well known someone has learned that these dates are not as available as their mintage totals might suggest in top grades like MS-65.

The early 1920s were a confused period primarily because the mints were basically taken away from their normal activities to create large numbers of silver dollars. The Secretary of the Treasury wanted over 200 million silver dollars produced and he wanted them in a hurry to back a new issue of Silver Certificates. It was not an easy task as silver dollars take time to produce and 24 hours a day for six days a week the lights never went out and the machines never stopped at the mints as silver dollars poured out in record numbers. All that activity, however, meant that the mintages of cents and other denominations were reduced dramatically. It explains why there was no 1921-D Lincoln cent as Denver was simply too busy making dollars. 

The situation also explains why the 1922-D had a low mintage of just 7,160,000 pieces. With such a low total the 1922-D has become a better date at $17.50 in G-4, $108 in MS-60 and $2,450 in MS-65. In fact, it probably could be higher but the 1922-D gets overshadowed by another 1922 Lincoln cent produced at Denver.

The 1922 no "D" was a result of something clogging the mintmark. As production continued, the die filled, and the mintmark became progressively less visible until finally there was none at all. Though produced at Denver, the coin looks to have been produced at Philadelphia but we know that is not the case as Denver was the only facility to produce Lincoln cents in 1922.

The 1922 with no "D" is a very tough coin, listing for $750 in G-4 for the variety with a strong reverse and it gets tougher in higher grades. In MS-60 it lists for $11,000 while an MS-65 is at $200,000.

In fact the price is fair as PCGS reports only two examples seen in MS-65 and in this case the grading services are likely to be a good gauge of available supplies as the 1922 no "D" is a coin where you want expert help as the loss of the "D" was progressive and the coins that have a very weak "D" might appear to have none but in fact are significantly less valuable than a coin that actually has no trace of the "D," With the high prices especially in Mint State you want to be sure of your purchase and that makes having any 1922-D with no "D" certified a good idea.

The continuing need to make silver dollars or catch up on the production of other denominations resulted in no Denver cent production in 1923, but production would resume again in 1924 and become regular after that. The dates from 1924-1929 are all better in MS-65 perhaps in part because of a lack of saving, or more correctly in this case, a lack of careful selecting as the collectors and dealers of the day were usually simply content with saving an uncirculated example without spending much time and effort to examine the coin to determine if it was a better example or simply an average coin. That was important as the 1920s were a period especially in the case of branch mints where quality was frequently low.

The best of the group from the period in MS-65 is the 1924-D, which is currently priced at $9,500 in MS-65 with PCGS reporting only 59 graded. The 1924-D in addition to the high MS-65 price is a better date in all grades thanks to a mintage of just 2,520,000 pieces. While that total is very low, historically the 1924-D receives relatively little attention considering it is in a very small group of Lincoln cents to have a mintage of fewer than 3 million.

The 1929-D is an interesting date that might well be suggested to be a transitional date. The Denver Lincoln cents of the 1930s are usually more available with prices of less than $100 even in MS-65. In the case of the 1929-D it is certainly more available than a date like the 1924-D with an MS-65 listing of $625 while an MS-60 is just $24, but it is tougher than the dates that would follow.

The greater availability of the cents from the 1930s certainly traces to higher mintages, but also increasing interest during the decade. The Great Depression amazingly saw coin collecting increase in popularity. Perhaps at a time of such economic distress, the idea of finding valuable coins in circulation appealed to many. That increased interest was supported as great information became available and most importantly the first holders to house a collection began to appear.

There were, however, some lower mintage dates like the 4,480,000 mintage 1931-D, which can be found at $5 in G-4 while the 10,500,000 mintage 1932-D is $1.40 and the 6,200,000 mintage 1933-D is $3.50 in G-4. While such dates bring premium prices in circulated grades, in Mint State their prices and availability reflect the fact that cents in greater numbers were being saved by the collectors and dealers of the period.

The popularity of Lincoln cent collecting continued to grow with the passage of time. It was natural as new collectors would start with the lowest denomination and when you couple that added saving with higher mintages, the supply of Lincoln cents in top grades would improve dramatically. Basically all of the Denver Lincoln cent dates from the 1940s and 1950s are available today and many times at prices below $20 in MS-65.

There is a better date in the form of the 1944-D/S which is an unusual coin for at the time there were not many errors at least in Lincoln cents. The 1944-D/S was discovered fairly quickly, which was also unusual, resulting in a $235 XF-40 price. An example in MS-65 is $3,750, which is probably a good price when you realize that PCGS has only seen only 18 examples. Until there is greater demand, however, the 1944-D/S will probably not reach the price levels that seem possible based on the numbers known.

The zinc-coated steel 1943-D is one of the popular cents of 1943 that are souvenirs of World War II as the special composition was created to conserve on copper supplies, which it was thought would be needed for the war effort.

The 1943-D had a mintage of 217,660,000, but the demand today keeps price strong at $8.50 in MS-65. Like the other 1943 cents, the 1943-D has a higher than average demand as the three cents of the year are regularly packaged as the special war year cents.

Ironically, while popular today with their different color, back at the time the cents of 1943 were unpopular with the public, which is why they were produced for just one year. They could be confused with the dime by people in a hurry.

In 1959 the Wheat-back was changed to the Lincoln Memorial reverse and now is changing again. The 1959 change in design at a time when collecting and especially cent collecting was popular produced another significant wave of interest.

Normally interest in a new design decreases after a year, but in 1960 the new Lincoln Memorial reverse cents were the talk of numismatics as it was discovered that some 1960 cents from both Philadelphia and Denver had a shorter upper stem on the "6" making them small dates. The 1960 small dates were a real sensation, although as it turned out there were large numbers of the small date 1960-D and that is why today the small date 1960-D is at basically the same price as the large date 1960-D.

In 1982 there would be a major composition change in the Lincoln cent to the current copper-plated zinc, but 1982 would see production of both the old and new composition cents and because there was a date modification, they would come with both large and small dates. That would mean that Denver would produce large date cents of the old composition and both small and large dates of the new composition, with the large date of the new composition being slightly better than the others.

The saving of the new and old composition cents in 1982 probably helped to prevent a potential supply problem as 1982 was the first of two years when there were no mint sets offered. With other denominations, we have seen supply problems for these two years as the mint sets serve as a reserve supply of Mint State examples for a specific year, but that reserve supply does not exist for either 1982 or 1983.

As it has turned out because of the composition change of the cent in 1982 and the interest it created, the 1982 cents were saved in large numbers. The same is not true in the case of the 1983 cents and that makes the 1983-D a date where there is potential for higher prices in the future. In fact, the 1983-D is not alone as there are other Denver dates from recent years where prices have increased slightly both for MS-65 examples and for uncirculated rolls. It is a trend that might well continue.

Historically speaking, the bulk of the focus for Lincoln cent collectors has been on the issues from San Francisco. That is justified in many cases, but as is seen, astute buyers have discovered that Denver also produced some surprisingly good Lincoln cents. With grading service totals now giving us a better picture of what dates are available in what grades it would seem that the Denver Lincoln cents are going to be receiving much more attention in the future.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Coin dealers see many Hoosiers investing in gold and silver

By Robert Annis

Recession prompts many to turn to gold and silver, according to coin dealers

"People are getting scared," Bernhardt said. "They're taking money out of other accounts and putting it into gold. They see it as an insurance policy, but one they don't necessarily want to cash in. If gold rises (a lot), it means everything else has tanked."

The U.S. Mint reported nearly 1.2 million gold coins were sold in 2008, almost triple the number of the year before, and more than 36,500 sold during the first week of 2009.

Gold closed Friday at $854.60 an ounce, while silver stood at $11.32 an ounce. Over the past year, silver dropped nearly $4 an ounce, but the price of gold fluctuated from $700 per ounce to $1,009 per ounce, increasing just 5 percent.

With the Dow Jones Industrial Average hovering in the mid-8,000s and unemployment reaching a 16-year high last week, many investors say they would happily take such a modest return but expect the price of gold to rise even higher.

National experts continue to debate the value of gold. Rick Aristotle Munarriz of investing Web site The Motley Fool suggested gold could be outperformed by Google stock this year, while the Fool's Christopher Barker endorsed a Citibank report predicting gold could reach $2,000 an ounce this year.

According to John Smith of Smith's Coins in Lafayette, co-sponsor of a coin show Sunday on Indianapolis' Northeastside, the number of investors has increased, but overall attendance at the show has dropped, as many hobbyists no longer can afford the pastime.

Sales of rare coins might be down, but one vendor at Sunday's show said he had sold the bulk of his silver U.S. Mint coins less than two hours after opening.

Bernhardt said most of his customers are putting 5 percent to 10 percent of their investment funds into gold, "just in case," but Indianapolis resident Dan Ashman estimated 75 percent of his investments are tied up in gold and silver coins.

"I've put more money into coins than I have my 401(k)," he said. "In the end, I think I'll get a better return on my investment."

Fred Warsco, Indianapolis, feels so confident about precious metals that he completely divested stocks and bonds from his portfolio several years ago.

"It's working out great," he said. "I've had almost no losses. People started calling me, asking for advice after they lost 40 percent of their investment in the (stock) market last year."

Although many analysts expect stocks to remain volatile over the next few years, Bernhardt advised caution.

"There are so many people, particularly on the Internet, saying conflicting things," Bernhardt said. "There's a lot of bad advice and information out there. You've got to be careful."

The high price of gold, combined with the desperate economy, apparently has led many Hoosiers to cash in their gold valuables to use the money for expenses. Bernhardt said most visitors to his coin shop lately were looking to sell coins, not buy them.